唔熟佢哋, BNO 需要擔心嗎？
摘錄如下（BBC）：
Freeze on ‘non-essential’ immigration
Two of Reform UK’s core five pledges are to do with migration. The party says it would freeze non-essential immigration, but concedes there would be exceptions with work in healthcare considered essential.
It plans to ban students from bringing partners and children to the UK and employers would have to pay 20% National Insurance on foreign workers (compared to 13.8% for British citizens), though there would be exceptions for the health and social care sector and very small businesses.
On the thorny issue of small boats smuggling migrants across the Channel, the party says it would “pick up illegal migrants out of boats and take them back to France”. But it does not explain how it would persuade France to accept that.
It says “zero illegal migrants” would be resettled in the UK. Asylum seekers arriving illegally would be processed rapidly and “offshore” if necessary. Those rejected would be “returned”. These are quite aspirational policies as some would be very hard to implement. Successive administrations have found it very difficult to find places to send failed asylum seekers to and negotiations with France have often got bogged down quickly.
A promise to deport foreign prisoners “immediately” after their release is already government policy, but has proved hard to implement with countries that are reluctant to help.
These policies all apply to the UK as a whole.
睇佢點定義 non-essential immigration，只係提難民同帶dependent過嚟嗰啲
BNO 係等平權，但係嗰啲唐人街黑工，印度，非洲，中美洲，東歐難民，加埋啲讀野雞大學學生，畢業後帶埋成家人去英國就係一個社會毒瘤，呢啲係唔會有平權機會。
香港人咁鍾意返工，又有錢，仲有咁大舊 MPF, 最緊要係有票在手，有票就係老闆，啲細政黨唔敢亂咁來。
1個讚
平權應該難架啦
非法入境冇票，但入得耐嘅變左合法一樣有票
1個讚
自從加拿大後我都驚，係我哋自覺香港人唔同其他移民，唔知個政府政黨係咪咁諗，或者佢哋有其他考慮
1個讚
如果本土之上，話之你老華僑架啦
問題係佢要全部當non essential移民先煩
其實我都聽聞有人講唔一定比PR (就算住夠五年），唔知英國政府還有沒有其他考慮
，出年就知…
1個讚
好歡迎英國政府認真審視入籍及PR申請，呢個係佢哋正常做法，我只係怕好似台灣咁有意刁難香港人，又好似加拿大咁拖慢嚟做，將香港人條隊同難民嗰條擺埋一齊，等候期間仲要唔做得嘢，死得人了
但加拿大本身就係咁 冇話特意要刁難香港人
係個政府無能力 以為做到其實做唔到
所以我上面嗰句係‘’台灣刁難香港人‘’，然後另一句‘’又好似加拿大咁拖慢嚟做‘’，個‘’刁難‘’唔係落埋加拿大嗰度
oh ok sor
但加拿大冇拖慢，佢哋本身都係咁慢
而太多申請s 根本做唔嚟 所以更加慢
1個讚
呢個我都明白，加拿大人慢啲嘅。但希望比到等PR嘅人工作visa，冇得做嘢好慘，即係迫人走
有錯請指正
呢個真係唔清楚
我(溫哥華) 身邊我識得既都成功續到
而等緊續既 有個email 定咩screen cap 證明等緊批既都可以繼續工作
聽過朋友既朋友話批唔到得一定要走既 一問詳情就個個唔知
所以唔清楚係咩原因批唔到 定係其實佢哋本身都想走？
讀緊書既仔女都繼續讀到 (但如果要升大學既仔女可能就麻煩D)
1個讚
有人被reject work visa
佢係唔會迫人走，但如果唔比人做嘢點樣一家人坐到2027年？
係 但係應該有寫reason for rejection
你又可以appeal
所以我唔太明個情況 
1個讚
被reject有好多原因架喎… 唔好一概而論話咩唔俾人做野
有啲人係因為填錯form，有啲就自己申請時跟錯程序交漏文件，咁當然亦有啲係因為批果個officer唔熟書唔知HK pathway而reject錯，所以有啲野真係唔好睇少少人講過乜就人云亦云
樓上講得啱，就算被reject都會有note，可以appeal，但可能每個case都不盡相同，我身邊亦無朋友被reject過
但戴定頭盔先，其實移民政策不嬲都五時花六時變架啦，而且唔同政黨上場亦會有唔同影響，無人知將來係點，唯有見步行步架咋，要知道呢個世界上有好多野我哋無辦法控制
1個讚
我睇呢啲，有錯請指正：
你列出嚟呢啲就唔係你之前講嘅「work visa被reject」喎，而家嘅問題係PR批得慢，原先嘅work permit唔夠長而過期但可能無得續，咁呢啲就係行政問題，同拒簽係兩回事
其實加拿大政府行政我覺得係失當架，不嬲慢又無乜系統同周詳計劃，不過呢邊嘅港人都有自強發聲同埋HK Watch等組織幫手爭取，其實都有加左啲新嘅措施例如去幫等批PR嘅香港人攞返開放式工簽繼續生活同等結果，當然佢哋有時政府內部都仲係溝通混亂出錯
不過自由黨繼續執政，我覺得個情況就真係未必太樂觀，始終而家加拿大國內嘅聲音都係叫緊要減移民同臨時居民數目
2個讚