sorry雖然個討論去到好遠,但係識分析嘅點解會㨂share fake news?
responsibility first lies with who share
dancer 黑頭像有名有姓嘅投訴,同個網絡匿名無來源嘅一段字,你覺得係同等份量嗎?講緊係連一個page都冇,冇source,格式同content farm一模一樣嘅文章。定係任何支持到你諗法嘅嘢,不管真實與否,都可以攞嚟支持自己「諗得啱」?
由樓上講菱藝,炒咗車,到講協興隆再講ITP… 你要討論個工程出問題判上判,唔先走去搞清楚邊間公司做?講緊我琴晚自己google都搵到嘅嘢
陰謀論冇問題,但分析係咪要有理有節?完全唔理有冇backing,唔google,唔問行內人,信埋啲「行內人陳師奶」無source嘅一段字,唔叫分析囉。就算最終證明你個論點係啱,so what? 代表你好有先見之明嗎?You did not take time to do the research. You did not help with finding the truth. You just got lucky, and a shameful confidence boost out of a very tragic incident
帶風向係講係你哋share嘅嘢係未經證實就係咁傳,傳到似層層,唔係幫viu或工程公司卸責喎,係講緊你哋傳假消息嘅責任。總有一撮人,share嘢share得快就覺得自己叻,收風快,人人都未講我就講。討論係要,但用假消息嚟討論就算鬼數
安全檢查9流流,判上判,亂簽名,100%係工程界常見(which 我覺得咁好有問題)。設計唔會係single point of failure, 照理係斷一條欖,有啲小錯誤,都唔應該會fail。點解今次咁離譜